I'm guessing SD will be called to testify by the defense if the prosecution doesn't call her.
The defensive will most likely question the credibility of the witnesses based upon previous contradictory statements and in Cohen's case, lies.
I'm guessing SD will be called to testify by the defense if the prosecution doesn't call her.
Lets see. SD is a known liar, who extorted Trump for money to keep quiet. Her ex attorney is in jail for a different extortions scheme and even said no evidence the alleged threat was tied to Trump according to PBS article linked below.Rideback wrote: ↑Wed Apr 05, 2023 10:22 am I posted the 2nd article to describe the scenario where if you read the history you'll remember that Trump/Cohen had a man threaten's Stormy's daughter. Avanatti filed a lawsuit, without her permission, a Calif judge ruled that it did not rise to the level of a distinct threat, she lost in court and owed Trump attorney's fees.
After seeing the threats that Trump has made against adversaries and as of yesterday the veiled threat made against the judge's daughter, one can only think that the irony here is that for many years Trump has used mob boss tactical threats (see Cohen's testimony how he was a 'fixer') but has never been charged. Hence, his threats got harsher and harsher (remember him threatening Zelensky?) to the point where 'ironically' on the day where he is arrested, while he sits in court and is told by a judge not to incite violence, he wins lawyers' fees from a woman whose daughter he had threatened because a judge didn't think the threat was a direct danger. And here we are.
Yes, it is ironic.
The gist of the article you can't see is:
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests