History of Fauci and PCR test (Beware - use your own due diligence)

Post Reply
woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

History of Fauci and PCR test (Beware - use your own due diligence)

Post by woodman »

If real history has been hidden from you, they may set you up to repeat the same misunderstandings...https://roundtablereport.com/?p=6582&fb ... V5Rk4MmTWs

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

Excerpt: "Fauci doesn't understand electron microscopy"... Nobel Laureate inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, died at the age of 74 back in August of 2019 but prior to his death, he had a lot of interaction with Fauci.

He’d already gone to war with Fauci for misusing his PCR test. Mullis and other scientists said Fauci was magnifying the retrovirus HIV using PCR to “prove” it was the cause of AIDS. Mullis was furious that Fauci refused to debate him on science but argued from authority.

Does this all sound familiar? It’s another reason why this COVID “novel” was not credible from the beginning. In the past, Fauci, CDC, etc, had abused test methods many times to push pandemics and pharmaceuticals.

“The strategy for locking us down again is based on these fraudulent tests. The magnified tests that don’t measure the quantity of anything. It’s the same strategy Fauci used to make a lot of money for a lot of people. It’s not just the PCR test, all these rapid tests, every one of them, they’re all NON-QUANTITATIVE tests. There’s no such thing as a non-quantitative test, it’s a lie, an obvious fraud. We’re locking everybody down over brainless lies. The only reason they were able to get away with this is because they’ve turned us into an idiocracy, that was the whole point of the government schools.”

“[Mullis] always said you couldn’t use [PCR] to diagnose a disease but in this particular clip, he goes directly after Fauci and tells what a liar he is,” reported David Knight on 12/10/2020’s show.

Knight then played the clip (here: https://twitter.com/libertytarian/statu ... 3076665346) where Mullis said, “These guys like Fauci get up there and start talking to me, you know, he doesn’t know anything really about anything, and I’d say that to his face. Nothing. The man thinks you can take a blood sample and stick it in an electron microscope and if it’s got a virus in there you’d know it. He doesn’t understand electron microscopy, and he doesn’t understand medicine, and he shouldn’t be in the position he’s in. Most of those guys up there on the top are just total administrative people, and they don’t know anything about what’s going on at the bottom. Those guys have an agenda, which is not what we would like them to have, being that we pay for them to take care of our health in some way. They’ve got a personal kind of agenda, they make up their own rules, they change them as they go. And Tony Fauci doesn’t mind going on television in front of the people who pay his salary and lie directly into the camera.”

Knight comments, “Fauci didn’t want to have the debate because he only argues from AUTHORITY. Mullis didn’t believe that there was a connection between HIV and AIDS and said they’re making this connection by misusing his test. He said we all have retroviruses and they’re, literally, blowing this way out of proportion. They’re amplifying it a TRILLION times, that’s what a PCR cycle of 40 does.” The FDA requires PCR testing of COVID to be 40 CT (cycle threshold).

“There’s an excellent article about Mullis and his conflict with Fauci by Celia Farber (here: https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-th ... t-a-virus/).

Knight comments, “Mullis didn’t believe that AIDS was caused by HIV, partly because it was barely detectable in AIDS patients. When PCR was used, they were able to see viral particles in quantities they couldn’t see before.”

Farber reports, ”Mullis himself was unimpressed. ‘PCR made it easier to see that certain people are infected with HIV,’ Mullis told Spin in 1992, ‘and some of those people came down with symptoms of AIDS. But that doesn’t begin even to answer the question — Does HIV cause it?’ ”

“Does that sound familiar?” asked Knight. “They misuse the PCR test and all of a sudden we’ve got cases everywhere. They did a complete media blackout of the HIV debate for over 7 years. Just like with vaccines right now.”

“Remember that the first thing Fauci did as director of the NIH was to make sure that BigPharma had legal immunity for any damage from vaccines. And remember, this was less than 10 years after we’d been rushed into a swine flu vaccine over a fake pandemic and a lot of people were injured by it. That was the reason he had to do it, it had nothing to do with science, it’s all about politics and money.”

But Fauci also took the reins of NIH’s infectious diseases as AIDS/HIV was pushed to the front by him and by media.

Mullis said “The mystery of [AIDS] has been generated by the $2 billion a year they spend on it. You take any other virus, and you spend $2 billion, and you can make up some great mysteries about it too.”

Knight compares the financial incentives of the AIDS industry in 1990s with GreatReset financial and political incentives with COVID. “What if you spend $20 billion on it? What if you were to reorder society and take everything from everyone over it? What if the pot at the end of all this is worth TENS of TRILLIONS of dollars to the bankers, globalists, and the politicians who work for them? For TRILLIONS of dollars, they could reset the whole world.” And all it takes is magnifying a virus a trillion times with a PCR of 40 CT.

“There are many parallels between what Fauci did with AIDS and what he’s doing with COVID. Mullis pointed out that the misuse of his test was just being done because there’s money involved. For 7-years the media stopped anyone questioning what Fauci said about AIDS. They’ve been censoring the debate over vaccines for quite some time and they’re going to step it up. YouTube was bragging about how they’re going to pull down any videos of anyone who questions the election now.”

“It’s a clear violation of the First Amendment, they’re taking our right to know, to debate. These people don’t want to debate, Mullis was saying he’d challenged Fauci but he wouldn’t show up. They will control the press, just like they did a blackout on AIDS, they’ll do a blackout on this vaccine,” concluded Knight.

See the full report above.

woodman wrote: Sat Dec 12, 2020 7:48 pm

If real history has been hidden from you, they may set you up to repeat the same misunderstandings...https://roundtablereport.com/?p=6582&fb ... V5Rk4MmTWs

User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by pasayten »

Fact check: Inventor of method used to test for COVID-19 didn’t say it can’t be used in virus detection

By Reuters Staff

Correction Nov. 13, 2020: The verdict of this fact check has been changed from false to misleading, to reflect that the quote examined may have been a fair reflection of Mullis’s views, even if not a direct quote. The body of the text is updated in places to further clarify this.

Social media users have been sharing a quote attributed to the inventor of the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) test, currently being used to detect COVID-19, which says “PCR tests cannot detect free infectious viruses at all”. This quote appears not to be a direct quote from the inventor, Kary Mullis, has lost some context and does not mean COVID-19 testing is fraudulent, as suggested by some social media posts.

The posts have been shared over 1,000 times on Facebook (here , here , here).

The post begins with the words “COVID-19 TEST a FRAUD?”, then introduces the alleged quote from Mullis, who invented the PCR method in 1985 and was recognized for this achievement by being awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 (here).

However, the quote is actually from an article written by John Lauritsen in December 1996 about HIV and AIDS, not COVID-19 (here).

The context around the quote shows Lauritsen is not saying PCR tests do not work. Instead, he is clarifying that PCR identifies substances qualitatively not quantitatively, detecting the genetic sequences of viruses, but not the viruses themselves: “PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

Even if Mullis had voiced a similar statement before his death in 2019, this quote does not mean the PCR test is unable to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 - the virus that causes COVID-19 - rather that it cannot determine whether the individual tested is infectious.

The PCR test is the preferred COVID-19 testing method in England (tinyurl.com/u9xxxup). It detects the presence of the virus by amplifying the virus’genetic material to a point where it can be detected by scientists (tinyurl.com/y7rno7pf).

A spokesperson for Public Health England told Reuters why PCR tests are being used widely in England: “Molecular diagnostic tests, such as real-time PCR, are the gold standard methods for identifying individuals with an active viral infection, such as SARS-CoV-2 (the cause of COVID-19 disease), in their respiratory tract. These tests are rapid and produce results in real-time.

“It is important to note that detecting viral material by PCR does not indicate that the virus is fully intact and infectious, i.e. able to cause infection in other people. The isolation of infectious virus from positive individuals requires virus culture methods. These methods can only be conducted in laboratories with specialist containment facilities and are time consuming and complex.”

VERDICT
Misleading. The quote regarding the limitations of PCR tests appears not to be directly from Mullis, but in any case is not evidence the test is fraudulent. PCR tests are being used widely in England to show that SARS-CoV-2 viral genetic material is present in the patient.

pasayten
Ray Peterson
Fun CH
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:22 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by Fun CH »

Thanks for the fact check Ray.

Unfortunately there are people who believe the misinformation with deadly results.

"Many COVID-19 patients insist ‘it’s not real’ until they die, nurse says"

https://globalnews.ca/news/7467283/coro ... urse-hoax/

"You don’t have to believe in COVID-19 for it to kill you.

Jodi Doering, an emergency room nurse in South Dakota, has watched that simple truth play out again and again over the last year, as many of her patients have denied the coronavirus‘ existence or their own diagnosis up to their dying breath."

Heli-free North Cascades
Keep the North Cascades Wild

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

Here is some current data from Pfizers own trial... Their rhetoric has been totally misleading, so in this video she breaks down the data for us, and interpreting their data can get tricky, probably mostly by design unfortunately.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/vPkf8POQNlFg/

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

alfrandell wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 7:26 am

Brad, you did not understand the fact check.
The pcr test works.
You again presented incorrect and misleading information.
Besides, you maintain that covid is a hoax, so working Tests would not be needed.
Your efforts will not get Trump back.

Most people now know that fact check is just another opinion, and over this plandemic, there is every reason to not trust them. Instead we should do our own independent research.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5hghq6TRXadg/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IidLq1zkaGYf/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/HhrdLcROKQbd/

Last edited by woodman on Sat Dec 25, 2021 2:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by pasayten »

woodman wrote: Fri Dec 24, 2021 11:41 pm

It is...Wakey,wakey. Most people now know that fact check is just another opinion, and over this plandemic, there is every reason to not trust them. Instead we should do our own independent research.

Good grief! Now "bitchute"?????? "
It is known for accommodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hate speech"
Brad... as long as your "research" continues to be based on these alt fake news sites, I will discount any opinions or conclusion you write... It's your right to believe your sources, but it is also my right to ignore their trash "science" and "facts"...

BitChute
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

BitChute

Type of site Online video platform
Available in English
Country of origin United Kingdom
Created by Ray Vahey
Parent Bit Chute Limited
URL bitchute.com
Registration Optional
Launched January 2017; 4 years ago
Current status Active

BitChute is an alt-tech video hosting service launched by Ray Vahey in January 2017.[1] It is known for accommodating far-right individuals and conspiracy theorists, and for hosting hate speech.[a] Some creators who use BitChute have been banned from YouTube; some others crosspost content to both platforms or post more extreme content only to BitChute.[2][15] BitChute claims to use peer-to-peer WebTorrent technology for video distribution,[1] though this has been disputed.[16][17]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BitChute

pasayten
Ray Peterson
Fun CH
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:22 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by Fun CH »

Fact checks are actually about facts, and checking facts against opinions. I'd say many folks don't actually understand what facts are.

"Everything is clear, here is here". Chris Squire

Heli-free North Cascades
Keep the North Cascades Wild

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

It sounds as if Alf is operating from a sense of authority that he thinks he holds over a group here. He claims to be about science, but when you share with him he seldom offers constructive comments when there is a substantial disagreement. He will refer to his resumee to boost his credibility or put down the other, too much othering...He wants to be hailed as the unofficial moderator, so that he can use his biting words to have power over free speech that doesn't agree with him.

On another note, I like the work of Dr. Zach Bush. I learned some things from him around June of 2020. One thing he mentioned that people should find interesting is that he either did a study himself or he discovered the study. It goes like this. There were 8,000 random healthy people in the US with no symptoms who were all tested for "HIV". What they found out from the tests was that 400 people tested positive for HIV, although they were perfectly heathy. What this shows me is that many of us carry viruses of all kinds, and you might even be able to say that we are infected. If those 400 people had received a formal diagnosis they would have been told by many doctors that they are HIV infected, although asymptomatic, and given a prescription for an antiviral. If it is determined by the CDC that there is a significant risk to a certain population for HIV in this case, then they will find 400 people who are completely healthy, but who simply test positive on a test, so then they become a "case". What many people are realizing is that you can be "infected" with a "virus", but you may very well not have any disease, and you should be free, because freedom is the greater good. Our bodies when we are in balance keep these "viruses" in balance, and I believe it is the same for bacteria. An example of this that medical people can easily relate to is streptococcus bacteria. We all have streptococcus in our bodies, but it only becomes strep or strepped throat when there other factors involved such as poor nutrition, stress, etc...

You would find 40M or so people in the Continent of Africa who have never been formally diagnosed with HIV, and they are completely healthy with no health issues and no need for treatment. They live a normal lifespan, and the vast majority probably don't even know they would test positive.

People like Alf who want to censor differing points of view should just mind their own business and move on.

Frankly, another person on this BB besides myself has also been the subject of doxing from others, and I believe that this person has more to offer from life experience than anybody else that I have seen on this BB. Some people have firsthand experience in healthcare or trauma care, and they see, and experience things that the rest of us don't. and although their experience is anecdotal, I believe their experience should have more weight than somebody who maybe used to be a scientist, or used to study science. Some anecdotal evidence/experience is more compelling than another's. When you get enough people with anecdotal experience it begins to have even more value, and at some point it is no longer anecdotal. I think I can safely say that being "infected" does not equate with having a disease.

If you don't like my point of view you can use a measure of caution as they say, and not pay any attention...Pretty simple, really.

Merry Christmas!

Last edited by woodman on Sat Dec 25, 2021 12:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.
PAL
Posts: 613
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by PAL »

Sure it's not...wokey, wokey?

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

Alf is doing a type of modeling now for individuals like me. He is telling you that I will continue to post a certain number of times, and I will not stop. How does he know this? He doesn't seem to trust individuals to make up their own minds without his coaching. Is this a sort of surreptitious fear mongering of the masses? He is predicting my next move. I guess I should feel special. He may be wildly inaccurate in his modeling of my future movements as Neil Ferguson from The Royal College of London was in March of 2020 which triggered a worldwide panic unnecessarily.

Build it and they will come. A cryptic message that the tide is shifting.

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

I heard yesterday that the editor for the asian division of the New York Times newspaper has passed away after a brief illness at 48 years old. It happened just a short time after he got the jab. I imagine it would be on the front page.

He was the deputy asia editor. Maybe it is just background as they say, in other words, just coincidence.
" The write-up from the so-called newspaper of record contains no mention of a vaccine issue, however, which perhaps is hardly a surprise in that the corporate media establishment has monolithically adopted a pro-vaccine editorial policy, including frowning upon even those who raise good-faith questions or merely seek additional information about safety or efficacy."

It should be no surprise that there was no mention in the NY times write up that he had just gotten the booster shot. What a bunch of great journalists they have over there. His own newspaper that he had been an editor for failed him even in his obituary. You can bet they would have mentioned if he had "Covid". Sins of omission by professional journalists is basically a lie, or worse.

https://www.bizpacreview.com/2021/12/27 ... t-1180687/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5hghq6TR ... hOWZ_ZcODk

Rideback
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:53 am
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by Rideback »

NYT Editor Carlos Tejada had a heart attack. He was not suffering from any underlying condition and his family are not claiming any connection to the vaccination he received.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4uDc87lQ3s

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

This ties in very much so with the virus mania that many people are captured by these days, although most consumers don't make the connection, hence we continue to stumble... All in my own words:

Another lie from antiquity hiding in plain sight: Louis Pasteur from the 19th century who was considered the father of germ "theory" recanted his whole life's work on his death bed when he said, "The germ is nothing, the terrain is everything." Based largely on the false foundation of his life's work we have become a nation of germophobes. If Louis were alive today he would not approve of PASTEURIZED milk. Imagine that! His journals and diary were kept secret until recently. Dr. Tom Cowan says he wouldn't give pasteurized milk to his worst enemy. He says if you drink milk, which he does not do anymore, you should drink raw milk. Raw milk actually tastes good! What is most ice cream made from?? If you drink pasteurized milk perhaps you have already lost the battle. Besides the dairy industry uses cruel practices on cows. I'm glad when I hear another of their dairies is going out of business. I don't do much dairy at all personally. Who still drinks pasteurized milk? Germophobes are afraid of the bacteria that may kill you!!!!! Social engineering maybe???? What industries have made $ off creating a fear of germs? Lysol comes to mind as a biggie. Common sense tells you that you don't want your kids to breathe that shihtzu! Perhaps you should rethink that next container of Haagen Dazz as well...

If they sterilize the environment maybe humans will become sterile ized.

Last edited by woodman on Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 1447
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by pasayten »

Well Brad... I will say one thing... You are very dedicated and consistant with your fake science posts and opinions... :D

pasayten
Ray Peterson
woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

pasayten wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:18 am

Well Brad... I will say one thing... You are very dedicated and consistant with your fake science posts and opinions... :D

Don't cry over spilt PASTEURIZED milk! If one person learns that pasteurized milk does not do a body good, and then begins to question other conventions and traditions of men it will be well worth my time. Thank You...

Rideback
Posts: 452
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:53 am
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by Rideback »

There is no evidence that Louis Pasteur said anything of the kind, this is one of the germ theory denier & anti vaxer myths.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/germ-t ... -pandemic/

Fun CH
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:22 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by Fun CH »

woodman wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 11:14 am
pasayten wrote: Fri Dec 31, 2021 10:18 am

Well Brad... I will say one thing... You are very dedicated and consistant with your fake science posts and opinions... :D

Don't cry over spilt PASTEURIZED milk! If one person learns that pasteurized milk does not do a body good, and then begins to question other conventions and traditions of men it will be well worth my time. Thank You...

you are free to believe as you wish, but why do you feel the need to preach this anti-anti to others?

Heli-free North Cascades
Keep the North Cascades Wild

woodman
Posts: 228
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: History of Fauci and PCR test

Post by woodman »

"RAP BATTLE" between 2 women. A good beat with a good ending...

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/vaxxer-v ... 8hZga.html

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests