Washington State Lost Its Spring Bear Hunt to Political Overreach—And It’s Just the Beginning

Post Reply
Jingles
Posts: 349
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2022 3:48 pm
Contact:

Re: Washington State Lost Its Spring Bear Hunt to Political Overreach—And It’s Just the Beginning

Post by Jingles »

In response to the question why are bears hunted? I am not speaking for all or even any other bear hunters but I hunt bears also for the meat similar to those that hunt and consume deer (venison) if you have never eaten bear you have missed an extremely good low fat, high protein, (IMO delicacy), the roast are second to none the chops are as good as any steak, the ground is less fatty than any burger in any store as long as you don't add a lot of pork or bear fat to it when grinding, the bear fat when used in pie crust makes some of the flakiest and best tasting crust you'll ever eat, and bear summer sausage is exceptional. The bear fat is also used in making soaps and for water proofing leather products..
So no I and many other hunters do not hunt bear, deer or any animal for just trophy purposes . Again speaking for just myself it is for putting meat in the freezer for myself and family
User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 2444
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Washington State Lost Its Spring Bear Hunt to Political Overreach—And It’s Just the Beginning

Post by pasayten »

Thanks... It just came across a news feed on my computer and I was talking to a bear hunter in Hanks minimart the other morning, so it struck me as interesting... Alog with the bears being bears and hitting some of the local bee hives... :-)
pasayten
Ray Peterson
User avatar
mister_coffee
Posts: 1389
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:35 pm
Location: Winthrop, WA
Contact:

Re: Washington State Lost Its Spring Bear Hunt to Political Overreach—And It’s Just the Beginning

Post by mister_coffee »

Ray,

The information in that press release is a little bit dated and misleading.

First off, there are now nine commissioners and the current chair is Barbara Baker.

For more details, you might want to speak directly with Melanie Rowland. She lives in Twisp and is one of the at-large commission members. She also voted against the Spring Bear Hunt in the most recent vote in April.

Sources:

https://www.opb.org/article/2022/03/21/ ... n-in-2022/

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2022/ ... nlikely-t/

https://wdfw.wa.gov/about/commission/members
:arrow: David Bonn :idea:
PAL
Posts: 1304
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Washington State Lost Its Spring Bear Hunt to Political Overreach—And It’s Just the Beginning

Post by PAL »

Are bear hunted because there are too many? What is the reason(s) for hunting bear, or any wild animal? I really don't know the science.
Of course I understand, somewhat, deer hunting if it is for the food the animal provides.
Ray, I honestly want to know, not argue.
I'm not a buddhist but I have trouble even killing some insects and even creepy spiders. They are living beings or entities or whatever, that's all.
But then again if they are eating my garden, I don't hesitate. I try to leave the good bugs. I feel bad killing the mice, the packrats, but I know the harm they cause and carry diseases.
But bear, that's hard for me to grasp. I agree with removing problem bears, ideally, relocating. Of course the bear is a "problem" because of us.
Pearl Cherrington
User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 2444
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Washington State Lost Its Spring Bear Hunt to Political Overreach—And It’s Just the Beginning

Post by pasayten »

Outdoor Life - BY BRIAN LYNN | PUBLISHED NOV 29, 2021 9:47 AM
Washington just lost it’s permit-only spring bear season when the state’s Fish and Wildlife Commission vote came up tied 4-4. This is despite the fact that the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife staff had recommended the commission approve the hunt, which has taken place each spring since 1999. The vote to stop the spring bear hunt highlights the political divisiveness in the state and game commission, as well as the abuse of power wrought by Gov. Jay Inslee and favoritism for urban areas west of the Cascade Mountains. And it’s emblematic of anti-hunting efforts taking place nationally—including in your state.

A former presidential hopeful who ran on a green-friendly, climate-change platform (and who stumbled answering basic questions about recycling), Gov. Inslee runs the state with an iron hand through emergency powers granted at the start of the pandemic (and yet-to-be rescinded), and by appealing to western Washington voters at the expense of more than 1.6 million citizens in rural eastern Washington. When he doesn’t overrule the game commission and advisory groups outright (like on cougars and wolves, which predominantly impact those residents in the east of the state), he governs through dysfunction, paralysis, and decree.


By law, the game commission is to have three representatives from eastern Washington, three from western Washington and three at-large commissioners. Gov. Inslee has left one of the eastern Washington commissioner seats empty for more than a year and has only appointed western Washington residents to the at-large seats. At best, that has set the table for tie votes, which makes accomplishing work difficult. At worst, it creates a lopsided representation on the commission when two-thirds of the state’s land mass and the majority of wildlife-conflict issues are east of the Cascades.

Further, game commissioner Larry Carpenter has been left unscrupulously on the commission as chairman in bureaucratic title only. In reality, Carpenter’s term was up more than a year ago. He either needs to be reappointed or replaced. But Gov. Inslee has kept him in place, doing neither. With a commission of eight and a chairman who he can replace at any moment, Gov. Inslee can unduly influence game commission matters. According to backroom-word-of-mouth, Carpenter (who has long been an ally of sportsmen) has become Inslee’s puppet, voting “no” on passing the spring bear hunt at the behest of the governor.

Gov. Inslee openly flaunts his disdain for Eastern Washington values, lifestyles, and livelihoods (which is ironic, since he lived out here for a decade) and instead panders to Seattle, Tacoma, Olympia, and other urban areas along the I-5 corridor in Western Washington. His overt disregard for accepted wildlife and predator management practices has emboldened the Humane Society of the United States, Center for Biological Diversity, and other animal-rights organizations to pull strings, submit petitions and file lawsuits to push their agenda upon the state fish and game commission and agency. Animal-rights activists know they have an ally in Gov. Inslee and they’re using it to their full advantage.


In fact, when it came to the spring-bear vote, the testimony of animal-rights activists and the comments by their allies on the game commission didn’t even bother to hide the fact that this entire discussion was a charade. At first, they tried to dismiss the science, and when they received pushback from trained biologists, commissioners shifted to social concerns: allaying the boisterous emotion-laden objections to the hunt by I-5 corridor anti-hunting citizens and big-money organizations.

Their entire argument prioritized emotion over science. As usual, the argument hinged upon the feelings around maternal care and offspring: an effective, passionate archetype everyone can relate to on some level. The promoted notion was that Washington hunters are recklessly slaying lactating females and leaving cute, orphaned cubs to wander the woods and die. In reality, just one of 145 bears taken in the 2021 spring bear hunt was shown to be a lactating female. Other studies point to about a 2-percent cub mortality due to hunting. A far cry from the picture painted by animal-rights activists, organizations, and commissioners.

Of course, the irony when discussing Washington bear hunting is that these same anti-hunting organizations who now use lactating sows and orphaned cubs as reasoning to end the spring hunt were the same ones who took away the most effective tools hunters had to avoid taking sows with cubs. A ballot initiative banned the use of bait and hounds for bear hunting—which help hunters to field judge bears and make smart harvest decisions—in Washington state in 1996. It’s a circular, self-fulfilling, argument that animal-rights groups invested in 25 years ago, and it’s still paying dividends for them today.


Before you think the ills of Washington state can’t befall your home state, you better think again. Partisan governors abound; “greening” of state fish and game departments and commissions by non-consumptive, alternative-approach, predator-management-aversive employees and beliefs systems is taking place in many states to one degree or another. The urban-rural divide only grows deeper and wider in every state as one or two cities control policy through the ballot or legislative process. Mainstream media only gins up more emotions with misrepresentations of hunting and wildlife management to drive website traffic.

Make no mistake: Hunting is under attack and Washington state is emblematic of the ills of society and the challenges facing hunters nationwide.

Powerful, well-funded animal-rights organizations know this and are working to further these rifts in states and within game commissions and agencies. The Sportsmen’s Alliance routinely fights to maintain the legitimacy of state game commissions, predator management, hound hunting, the use of bait, and trapping. These have become the touchpoints of the animal-rights movement in recent years. They’re difficult concepts to explain and therefore an easy sell to the non-hunting public and politicians seeking re-election.


Every anti-hunting game commissioner appointed within a state, every coyote-contest ban passed or onerous trapping regulation enacted weakens the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation a little more. When enough cogs in the model’s wheel are removed, the model itself will begin to break—which is the goal of animal-rights movement. At the end of the day, wildlife and habitat will pay the price. Washington state is just the most recent example of how anti-hunters are undermining wildlife management.

What can hunters do about it? We can do a better job of teaching non-hunters about who we are, what we do, and why it matters. And we must rally together to vote down ballot initiatives and vote out politicians who are chipping away at our hunting rights.
pasayten
Ray Peterson
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests