Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post Reply
woodman
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by woodman »

Ivermectin has been used by doctors off label for many decades, and it is very safe. Also, humans use many of the same antibiotics that are used for animals. OH NO!!!
PAL
Posts: 1308
Joined: Tue May 25, 2021 1:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by PAL »

All I know is at the beginning of my shingles outbreak, I was prescribed a very strong anti-viral and it shortened it to 3 days. I was very lucky to catch it in time and start the medication early. It worked, is all I know.
Pearl Cherrington
User avatar
mister_coffee
Posts: 1408
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:35 pm
Location: Winthrop, WA
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by mister_coffee »

No, just no. No no no no no.

If germ theory is "wrong", antibiotics, antivirals, and vaccines wouldn't work at all. They demonstrably do. When was the last time you saw someone get smallpox or polio?
Screen Shot 2021-12-13 at 7.16.39 AM.png
Now, to clarify. Not all diseases are caused by infectious microorganisms. And not all microorganisms cause disease. And people are different enough that an infectious dose that can kill one person might not cause any distress at all in another. This stuff is complicated and making simple assumptions and statements gets you nowhere.
:arrow: David Bonn :idea:
woodman
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by woodman »

Germ theory v. terrain theory... The mainstream media controlled by (you know who) doesn't want us to consider that terrain theory was undermined in sort of a hostile takeover. Germ theory is an unproven theory. Louis Pasteur who lived in the 19th century was considered by many to be the father of germ theory. Louis Beauchamp was one of his contemporaries. Beauchamp championed terrain theory which says basically that the germ is nothing, the terrain is everything. Towards the end of his Life, actually on his deathbed, Pasteur admitted that Beauchamp was correct, so basically Pasteur recanted his whole life's work. This is history that has been hidden from the mainstream. I shudder to consider what the so-called fact checkers will say since they are all bought and paid for. By the way, Louis Pasteur would not approve of pasteurized milk. How do you like that? Nobody should drink pasteurized milk.

A simple example of terrain theory would be with the common cold. Most of us have subscribed to the idea that you can catch a cold from somebody else through the air. Terrain theory says that cold symptoms are a result of the cells of the body doing housecleaning, in other words, the sniffles, and mucus release is simply the intercellular debris being released to rid the body of garbage or cellular debris. Terrain theory says it is a completely internal process basically. If you look at this cellular debris using electron microscopy, you will see exosomes. According to some experts these exosomes are being misinterpreted as viruses.
Last edited by woodman on Mon Dec 13, 2021 6:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 2452
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by pasayten »

For Brad... Looking at your sources, you might be interested in this emf/5G blocking hats and clothing... :-)

https://getlambs.com/?utm_source=facebo ... k-JMaWg0tQ

"Reduce brain fog - 78% of Lambs customers report a boost in cognition (reduced brain fog and headaches), memory, and happiness."
pasayten
Ray Peterson
woodman
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by woodman »

A new paradigm is inevitable. Dr. Andrew Kaufman is open to having a debate based on the scientific issues, and people that have been invited have not wanted to participate. Learn from history... We are witnessing a similar set of dynamics as what happened with AIDS in the early '80's. This is so important for people to understand. Dr. Andrew Kaufman speaks at the 18:30 minute mark...

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-s-tho ... ACUYV.html
woodman
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by woodman »

mister_coffee wrote: Tue Dec 07, 2021 8:02 am You can't make this stuff up.

On second thought, that seems to be exactly what is going on.
I just want to share this with you from Dr. James Lyons-Weiler. I know you probably believe this is full of confirmational bias, so they are a pretty bold organization with a name like INSTITUTE FOR PURE AND APPLIED SCIENCES (IPAK). Below is a quote extracted from the article link that I am posting just so you know "negative efficacy" is not something I made up.

" Yesterday, I published a mathematical analysis that showed that the Barnstable County, Massachusetts (CDC data) supports the conclusion of negative efficacy (vaccinated people more likely to be diagnosed with COVID-19)".

https://popularrationalism.substack.com ... J6Ozv1Zm78
User avatar
mister_coffee
Posts: 1408
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 7:35 pm
Location: Winthrop, WA
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by mister_coffee »

You can't make this stuff up.

On second thought, that seems to be exactly what is going on.
:arrow: David Bonn :idea:
User avatar
pasayten
Posts: 2452
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2021 8:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by pasayten »

REUTERS FACT CHECK
MARCH 30, 202111:56 AM
UPDATED 8 MONTHS AGO
Fact Check-SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated and its complete genome has been sequenced
By Reuters Fact Check

6 MIN READ


An interview with a late Canadian writer has resurfaced on social media and shows him making several false claims about COVID-19. Among them, he questions the existence of coronaviruses by saying they have never been isolated. This is not true, and such a claim reveals the writer’s lack of understanding of virology.

A clip from the interview was posted to several Instagram accounts in mid-March (here, here and here), and was taken from a wider 95-minute podcast recorded in May 2020 (here). It shows the interviewee, who died several months later (here, here), claiming scientists who say SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated are lying as “nobody has ever purified a coronavirus”.


“You can tell a virologist is lying when they use the word ‘isolation’,” he said. “There’s innumerable papers that say we isolated the virus, but let me describe how they did it… They took a nasal swab and they processed it somehow; like you have to add antibiotics to kill bacteria and things like that. So you process it and add it to a cell culture. They observed cells dying in the cell culture and they wrote: ‘We have isolated the virus.’ Clearly, it’s not specific. Even if you have identified a virus, you haven’t identified a specific virus. So then they searched around for RNA and they found a long string of RNA which looked like what had previously been called coronavirus. But nobody has ever purified a coronavirus.”

When asked whether this means no one knows if coronaviruses exist, he added: “Yeah, I think what they did; they looked at people with the common cold and they found some RNA patterns and they said: ‘Oh this must be the virus.’ They leaped to these conclusions. With the new world of biotechnology and PCR, this technology that underlines the test, these things are really easy to do but they’re not grounded in anything.”

However, the first argument relating to isolation is not true. There are multiple examples of scientists isolating SARS-CoV-2 (here, here, here, here), the virus that causes COVID-19 disease, where they also sequenced the complete genome (here, here, here). Pictures of isolated SARS-CoV-2 particles have been released by the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (here).

Meanwhile, the second argument, that coronaviruses have never been purified, shows a misunderstanding of how viruses work – and does not prove they do not exist. Siouxsie Wiles, an associate professor at the University of Auckland’s Department of Molecular Medicine and Pathology, has previously addressed similar claims, saying they reference outdated microbiological theory (here).

Wiles said claims about purification come from the four “postulates”- or conditions - laid out by 19th Century German microbiologist Robert Koch on how to conclude whether a microbe is the cause of a disease. One of these conditions stipulates the organism must be isolated from the host, ie: the infected human, before being grown in a pure culture.

However, Wiles says that at least one of these postulates was made obsolete in Koch’s time – and all were devised before viruses were discovered.

“Viruses aren’t like the bacteria that Koch was busy discovering,” Wiles said. “Viruses need to take over a host cell to replicate. In other words, they turn cells into virus-producing factories. And depending on what proteins a virus has on its surface, it may only be able to infect very specific cells from certain host species, or a wide range of cells from lots of different species.

“That’s why when virologists want to isolate a virus from a sample, they’ll take the sample or some part of it and add it to some cells – usually ones that are relatively easy to grow in the lab – and then look to see if the cells die and/or if there are any virus particles released into the liquid nutrient bath the cells are growing in.”

Since the new coronavirus was discovered, there have been more than 123 million cases of novel coronavirus infections confirmed worldwide. There have also been more than 2.8 million deaths reported as a result of COVID-19 (here).

VERDICT
False. There are numerous examples of scientists isolating SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID -19, and sequencing its genome. The argument about purification relates to 19th Century microbiological theory that does not apply to viruses. The novel coronavirus has been proven to exist and has caused millions of deaths worldwide.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work here.    
pasayten
Ray Peterson
woodman
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by woodman »

The problem for science and Covid-19 as I see it is there is no virus particle that you can identify as Covid-19, and of course that is the same for supposed variants. I know why nobody wants to debate these guys. Kary Mullis was the inventor of the PCR test, and he said that the PCR test should not be used to diagnose disease. He is on record saying that he challenged Dr. Fauci many times to a debate in front of the student body at University of North Carolina back in the '90's, and Fauci always avoided the opportunity. Look up Dr. Peter Duesberg and find out what happened to him when he had a difference of opinion with the mainstream narrative going all the way back to the '80's...

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/dr-thoma ... WN4ac.html
Last edited by woodman on Mon Dec 06, 2021 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Fun CH
Posts: 1440
Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2021 4:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by Fun CH »

Fact checking the disinformation on Brandnewtube

https://healthfeedback.org/outlet/brandnewtube/


Conspiracy theorists make money of disinformation

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/0 ... -theories/

"How covid-19 conspiracy theorists are exploiting YouTube culture
Covid-19 conspiracy theorists are still getting millions of views on YouTube, even as the platform cracks down on health misinformation.
by Abby Ohlheiser May 7, 2020


When the notorious conspiracy theorist Alex Jones was kicked off YouTube and Facebook in 2018, the lesson was supposed to be that deplatforming works. Without access to his millions of followers on mainstream social media, Jones became an online ghost, diminished and shouting his dangerous unfinished business to a much smaller audience.

But some people online took a second lesson from the change: conspiracy theories, and the people who promote them, can get a lot of views—and money"

Alex Jones is on Brandnewtube now.


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/brand-new-tube/

"Brand New Tube does not clearly state who owns them. However, on the contact page, they list an address to MY MEDIA WORLD LTD. There is little information about this company. Revenue is derived from the sale of branded merchandise."

"In conclusion, Brand New Tube promotes tin-foil hat conspiracy theories and quackery-level pseudoscience. They completely lack credibility based on a lack of transparency and numerous failed fact checks."
What's so funny 'bout peace love and understanding--Nick Lowe
Can't talk to a man who don't want to understand--Carol King
Rideback
Posts: 1813
Joined: Fri Nov 12, 2021 5:53 am
Contact:

Re: Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by Rideback »

'Dr' Glidden, a naturapath has had a documented problem with the truth in the past. He is not a scientist nor an MD nor even a historian.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chemo ... e-whistle/
woodman
Posts: 257
Joined: Thu Jul 16, 2020 8:17 pm
Contact:

Dr Glidden's science based medicine

Post by woodman »

An interview with Dr. Glidden, ND in which he describes that the medical system we have has been a monopoly since 1912. Allopathic medicine is not suited to treat most diseases...

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/us-medic ... UFvnF8RiVo
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests